Here is an account of a little-known Houdini underwater escape in New York City on April 3, 1912. Houdini had planned to leap from the Willis Avenue Bridge into the Harlem River. But police forbade a jump from the bridge itself, so a rowboat had to suffice. But there's another detail here that really stands out. Houdini left his handcuffs and irons at the bottom of the river!
 |
| New York Tribune, April 4, 1912. |
This isn't the only time Houdini did an underwater escape from a rowboat, so I can't say whether the below image from Shutterstock is from this specific jump. But his age looks right. The escape was also filmed.
So what about the claim that Houdini left his manacles in the river? This is the only time I've ever heard of him doing such a thing. Did the reporter get this right? If so, I doubt it was intentional as these would have been his own special "jump cuffs." So he might have accidentally dropped them. That would mean they are still there!
Wouldn't it be something if these cuffs could be recovered? They would have instant provenance and be valuable handcuffs indeed. The original Willis swing bridge was replaced with a new one 2010, but the location remains the same. So maybe it's time to break out the scuba gear!
Related:
That looks like Kukol fastening the chain behind Harry. The familiar X pattern across the chest. You see it in the Boston and Australian jumps. The manacles and chains are real metal and the extra weight surely pulled him down deeper. You can see why some imitators drowned.
ReplyDeleteIndeed, that does appear to be Kukol.
DeleteKukol with a fresh haircut, and HH in need of a haircut. I wonder if HH ditched the long chains in the rivers and just kept the jump cuffs to reuse. Not worth carrying a long heavy chain and treading water. I doubt it was 30 pounds of manacles. That's a lot.
DeleteVery interesting story, and the call-out in the news article about the irons and handcuffs being at the bottom of the river is pretty eye-popping. They'd probably be buried deep in sludge, but given their weight would have to still be down there. That area of the river is also pretty narrow, so it wouldn't be impossible to search with the right equipment. (Interestingly, there's a woman in London who wrote a book about the things she has found washed up along the shore of the Thames River -- ancient coins, keys, centuries-old pottery, and even an Elizabethan shoe! But no Elizabethan handcuffs as far as I know!)
ReplyDelete